Ravenna Mosaics (6th - 7th century)
San Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna (Arian phase)
|
1. San Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna. A scene from Christ's life: Christ, flanked by his courtly angelic advisors,
pronounces the last judgement, separating the sheep from the goats. Before 526 A.D. The top of the two
rows of mosaics along the nave and above and between the windows were made when the church was first
built, sometime before 526, when it was Arian Christian (under the Ostrogothic kings) and Ravenna had not
yet been reincorporated into the Eastern Roman Empire by the armies of Justinian. This top row of mosaics
shows twenty-six scenes from Christ's life. They are small rectangles which are hard to see if you are
standing in the nave, which may be why they were not updated. The Ostrogothic mosaics were more inclined
to treat Christ naturalistically and accomodate him within a Roman imperial framework.
|
|
2. San Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna. Top zone nave mosaic showing Christ before Pilate. This series of mosaics
representing the life of Christ avoids the crucifixion because in the Arian Christian tradition the emphasis was
on the human Christ living in the context of the Empire..
|
|
3. San Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna. Mosaic detail of Saint Andrew and fisherman, before 526 A.D.
Also from the top row, but reflects more of the traditional lively narrative than the previous mosaic.
Here a colorful simple design with a sober rendering of masses.
|
Arian Baptistry, Ravenna
|
1. Arian Baptistry, Ravenna. Central cupola mosaic showing John baptizing Christ, surrounded by the
Apostles. Under Theodoric, who was installed by the Roman Emperor Zeno as both regent in Italy
(493-526 A.D.) and king of Rome's Ostrogothic army, royally sponsored mosaics reflect Ostrogothic
religious conceptions. This was a traditional Christian belief as it existed prior to Constantine's theological
intervention, which came to be known as Arian Christianity. It tended to see Christ historically, in human
and naturalistic terms, rather than as a symbol or transcendental spirit, and baptism was particularly
significant.
|
|
2. Arian Baptistry, Ravenna. Detail of John baptizing Christ. Christ is here treated in a worldly and
classical fashion. While there are symbols, including the representation of the river Jordan in human
form, and hieratic elements (linear drapery, gold ground, peculiar perspective), Christ is basically a
classical nude. Theodoric was raised in Constantinople, and he may well have brought Greek speaking
craftsmen with him when he was sent to Italy.
|
|
3. Arian Baptistry, Ravenna. Saints Peter and Paul flank Christ's throne. While Christ is here present
only in symbolic form, and there are other hieratic elements, there is also a narrative naturalism.
|
|
4. Arian Baptistry, Ravenna. Saint Peter with his key.
|
|
5. Arian Baptistry, Ravenna. Saint Paul with his book (rotulus).
|
Archbishop Andrea's palace chapel, Ravenna
|
1. Archbishop Andrea's palace chapel of San Andrea. Mosaic decoration of the oratory cupola, ca. 494-519,
shows that orthodox Christianity did well under the rule of Arian Ostrogoths.
The four angels float in a pose recalling orants. The six-pointed cross and the crosses on the side with
the alpha-omega resemble the Constantinian medallion. The evangelist iconograpy is fairly mature here:
Mathew is a winged man representing the Incarnation; Mark a winged lion representing royalty;
Luke a winged ox representing sacrifice; and John an eagle representing inspiration.
|
|
2. Archbishop Andrea's palace chapel, Ravenna. Christ as legionary overcomes evil in the form of a snake.
Christ, as in Arian mosaics, is represented here in naturalistic terms, but there is a subtle difference. He
is not a classical nude, as East Mediterranean artists in Theodoric's suite might represent him, but a frontal
legionary. The expressive eyes and a combination of hieratic elements (elaborate nimbus and cross, symbol
of evil as a snake) and narrative probably reflect Italian plebeian tastes.
|
|
3. Archbishop Andrea's palace chapel, Ravenna. Nevertheless, the apse mosaic represents Christ as an
abstract symbol in the heavenly sky rather than as a real person that once lived on earth. This is the
trend usually manifested in orthodox art.
|
|
4. Archbishop Andrea's palace chapel, Ravenna. Saint Paul. Again, hieratic elements, such as the
frontality, gold ground, and label, but Paul's naturalistic and expressive face reflect parochial and
Italian provincial tastes somewhat removed from the East Mediterranean aesthetic.
|
San Vitale basilica, Ravenna
|
1. San Vitale basilica, Ravenna. Interior. Although the construction of San Vitale began under Archibishop
Ecclesius (521-534), it was not finished until 547, and the mosaics were made under the authority of
Justinian, whose general Belisarius took the city in 540. Artisans from Constantinople may have followed the
army and had a hand in the mosaic work.
|
|
2. San Vitale, Ravenna, middle of presbyterium dome, mosaic of the "tent of heaven." Orant
angels support the Lamb Triumphant surrounded by garland of four seasons which suggests Paradise.
The classical acanthus is handled naturalistically, and the symbols are concrete. The Lamb is on a blue
rather than gold ground.
|
|
3. San Vitale, Ravenna. Typical East Mediterranean basket-type capital. We see here an early expression
of the coming feudal aesthetic, where space exists as a milieu rather than a limit. That is, meaning exists in
terms of the relations of things rather than through their surfaces. The counterposed animals reflect the
Sassanid influence in the East Mediterranean, although the hom has been changed here to a cross and the
animals are lambs (?). The mosaic above with the doves and basket of fruit represents the Holy Spirit and
Paradise, respectively.
|
|
4. San Vitale, Ravenna. Choir vault decorative mosaic. Peacocks in paradise, acanthus tendrils and
dolphins. The entire choir is cloaked with a mosaic carpet of blazing color that masks the wall structures.
|
|
5. San Vitale, Ravenna. Apse mosaic of the theophany. Christ as cosmocrator sits on the sphere of the cosmos.
Saints, including Saint Vitalis and Archbishop Ecclesius and a donor are being welcomed into the celestial garden
of Paradise. Beneath flow the four rivers of Paradise, which become part of standard iconography. The
heavenly Paradise is represented both naturalistically (vegitation; pink and blue clouds), but also symbolically
(gold ground). The stylistic ambivalence also see in the handling of the figures, which are both transcendent
two-dimensional frontal floating figures, playing roles, and yet also individuated. Sharply contrasting color
touches are expressive.
|
|
6. On either side of the apse are imperial processions, and here is the court of Justinian. To the right are
clergy, including Archbishop Maximanus, and monks. To the left are secular officials, including military
officers who bear the Constantinian monogram on their shield. One suspects it is General Belisarius who
stands just behind and to the right of Justinian. The frontal pose with functional separation of groups recalls
court ceremony. Formal heiratic pattern overcomes naturalism: little feet stepping on each other's toes;
rich linear drapery; ritual gesture holding symbols. But there is nevertheless green earth and an individuation
of the faces.
|
|
7. San Vitale, Ravenna. Here a dignitary from Justinian's retinue. Note the linear drapery pattern and
fontal pose. Sharp color contrasts are used to intensify expression. The individuation of facial features
leads one to suspect that these may be actual portraits done by artists from Constantinople.
|
|
8. Theodora's court. Neither Justinian nor Theodora were actually present in Ravenna, but she is nevertheless
represented as part of an imperial court group on the side of the apse opposite her husband and as handing
over a jpgt. So this scene must be understood symbolically rather than literally. Note the feet and drapery.
Hieratic elements seen in the linear abstraction, gold ground, and frontality.
|
|
9. Head of the Empress Theodora. Originally a north African actress, Theodora was considered
no better than a prostitute, and yet she was apparently the real brains and power behind the
imperial throne. Mother of pearl is used here as tesserae. The goal of hieratic decorative pattern
overcomes naturalism. While the imperial mosaics in Ravenna certainly reflect the influence of
Constantinople, if one compares them with contemporary work in Hagia Sophia or Salonica, it is
evident that they are not merely an expression of courtly taste, but an independent local tradition.
|
|
10. Detail from Theodora's retinue, before 547 A.D. The two figures are carefully individuated although
parts of a rhythmic pattern of repeated forms.
|
|
11. Mosaic detail of a lady in Theodora's retinue. A mosaic such as this is often felt to manifest the
high point of the Western mosaic art form, representing both the character and the limits
of the medium. The use of highly colored vitreous paste tesserae allows the artist to achieve effects
impossible in any other art form except perhaps polychrome metal work.
|
|
12. Medallions with portraits of the Apostles Thomas and Jacob from a set of twelve
apostles on the underside of an arch. The hugh church of San Vitale has mosaics everywhere, and it is
considered a major monument in Western art history. The smallest detail, easily overlooked, proves exciting
on close inspection. For example, while these two apostles lack plastic values, their faces are individuated
and expressive. The lively stylized dolphins on the blue ground are naturalistic, and the medallion employs
an architectural roundel to achieve a depth perspective.
|
|
13. San Vitale, Ravenna. General view of a group of mosaics. The mosaics from this church tend
to focus on Biblical themes.
|
|
14. A detail from this group shows Moses receiving the law on Mt. Sinai. The use of color
here is impressionistic rather than naturalistic, but is effective. There is a mix of naturalistic and such hieratic
elements as the addition of a "Moses" label to echo the naturally represented content in symbolic form. The
ambivalence of so much of the art in 6th-century Ravenna suggests it is sub-Roman and transitional rather
than truely feudal.
|
|
15. Another detail from this group, the Sacrifice of Abel and Melchisedec. Traditional classical
narrative scene with plastic values in the figures, with some subtle color and shading to convey them,
yet also some hieratic influences, symmetry, stylizations, labels in the sky, and ritualistic gesture.
|
|
16. San Vitale, Ravenna. Another general group of mosacs.
|
|
17. Detail from this group showing the Hospitality of Abraham. While proportions are hieratic,
Abraham's wife has an expressive gesture.
|
|
18. Here is an example of the "Inspired Evangelist" iconographic theme. Each Evangelist
has a set of associated symbols. Mark is shown here with an open codex, writing stand, and lion, but it is
John on Patmos who becomes the symbol of inspired writing specifically, and so the iconography is here
still a little ambivalent.
|
San Apollinare in Classe
|
1. San Apollinare in Classe basilica, apse basin mosaic, 549 A.D. Saint Apollinare with lambs on a gold ground.
Classe was Ravenna's port on the Adriatic, but today nothing is left but the church. A number of other coastal
towns grew in significance during the troubles of the 5-6th century, but after the Gothic Wars sank back into
obscurity or disappeared altogether. San Apollinare in Classe's mosaics date shortly after the East Roman
occupation and are therefore Orthodox rather than Arian and are in the apse area. Here Saint Apollinare is
accompanied by twelve sheep representing the twelve apostles. Together with the lambs, Peter, Paul and
John, and figures of the prophets Elias and Moses, we see an entire heavenly court surrounding the medalion
that suggests Christ as King of Heaven. This stands in conscious opposition to the Arian view of Christ as an
earthly figure placed in the context of the Roman Empire.
|
|
2. Saint Apollinare with lambs on a gold ground. The lambs are presented from a side view to enhance
the narrative effect, and the grass, rocks and trees also add some degree of naturalism.
|
|
3. Detail of apse mosaic showing Bishop Apollinare. Conventions are present here which long affect painting:
the combination of lilies and roses to symbolize virtues and Christ's Passion, stylized trees, and rocks with
cleavages, which might point to the revolutionary implications of the Christian era. In contrast images in the
top (heavenly) zone, while Apollinaris is frontal and his gesture ritualistic, he stands firmly on the ground
and his face is natural.
|
|
4. Mosaic detail showing Christ in a roundel. This heavenly region is more hieratic and symbolic, in contrast
with the more narrative and naturalistic lower zone of the apse mosaic, Christ is here not a youthful soldier
or classical nude, but a mystical guru. His treatment is highly stylized and linear (the drapery edge unites
hand to face; lines in forehead, pointed beard); he is now an older, severe, heavenly lawgiver. While it is
said the Byzantine tradition tends to de-emphasize the human Christ and the Arian tradition to do the opposite,
the two zones of this mosaic suggest the difference is more subtle than that. The zones represent the
theological contradiction between matter and spirit as a real (Kantean) opposition, versus the Arian avoidance
of contradiction and versus the later (early feudal, Augustinian mystical) reconciliation of the two as merely
aspects of a unitary process of salvation.
|
|
5. Mosaic detail of the symbol for the Evangelist Luke: an ox, often winged and with his Gospel. Not only
are the symbols of the Evangelists being defined at this time for the future, but even the pink and blue
rolled cotten clouds become a convention.
|
|
6. San Apollinare in Classe, mosaic detail. Symbol of the Evangelist John. 547 A.D. John is represented
by an Eagle, often with writing implements on Patmos, where he wrote his Gospel. The iconograpy also
serves to represent the idea of divine inspiration.
|
|
7. Mosaic detail from the apse area. St. Michael. He is fully hieratic, although the stylizations don't
prevent a certain interest in beauty for its own sake, as in the rich pattern and pleasing lines. Also
the pretty, rather classical treatment of the face.
|
|
8. Mosaic detail of Elias. 547 A.D. While Saint Apollinare was frontal and his gesture ritualistic, he stood
on the ground and had a somewhat individuated face. In contrast, the prophet Elias is in the upper,
heavenly, zone. He is partially disembodied. His drapery is energized and floats in the air. While shading
still provides some sense of plastic values, the figure tends to become linear, such as his eyebrows,
forehead furrows, and ascetic face.
|
San Apollinare Nuovo basilica, Ravenna (Orthodox phase)
|
1. San Apollinare Nuovo basilica, Ravenna. The enthroned Christ flanked by angels, 556 A.D. When
in 540 the East Roman Exarchs took over Ravenna, they reconsecrated the Arian churches. San
Apollinare was reconsecrated in 556 and was given a new bishop (Archbishop Agnellus, 556-569). At
that time the lower row of mosacs along the nave were removed or altered. Originally the bottem row
showed a long courtly procession that lead from the Ostrogothic royal palace to Christ and Mary seated in
majesty on opposite sides of the nave. Here Christ is seated on this throne. Because Agnellus decided not
to change this portion of the mosaic, Christ manifests Arian Christian naturalism.
|
|
2. The procession of martyrs. What was originally a courtly procession leading to Christ was replaced
by a file of twenty-six martyrs with Saint Martin. This long file of solumn white figures along the nave
of the church is effective overall, with its emphasis on mass movement rather than individual
expression.
|
|
3. San Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna. Mosaic showing procession of martyrs led by Saint Martin. The use of
small vitreous paste tesserae create a shimmering effect. Considerable restoration limits any analysis of
these mosaics.
|
|
4. San Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna. The lower zone of mosaics along Mary's side of the nave has a
long procession of twenty-two virgins, led by the Magi, who approach Mary.
|
|
5. Mosaic of enthroned Mary with angels. End 6th c. A.D. In contrast to the Arian mosaic of
Christ, Mary gets a more stylized and hieratic treatment (note her small head, hands and feet), which
suggests she was remade in 556. Even the platform on which her feet are placed shows less naturalistic
perspective.
|
|
6. Magi with a virgin. End 6th c. A.D. The group of Magi with Gallic caps is particularly effective, with its
rich colors and sense of the movement, and yet each Magus is individuated. Unfortunately, later restorations
undercut any reliable historic analysis.
|
|
7. Mosaic detail of the Arrival of the Magi. The restoration is so extensive that analysis is impossible
beyond saying that the naturalism of the faces is entirely inappropriate for the era when the mosaics
were first made.
|
|
8. Mosaic detail showing the Emperor Justinian, 556 A.D. Although Justinian was alive when this mosaic was
made, he nevertheless gets a nimbus (with Sassanid beads, reflecting the orgin of the symbol), which suggests
his role as God's direct agent on earth. The effect of Justinian's take-over of Italy was not positive. Not only
were the Gothic wars terribly destructive, but the powerful landowners continue to resist being governed.
While the Lombard arrival did not affect Ravenna directly, it tended to isolate the area. We therefore do not
see in Ravenna the neo-classicism then in fashion at the court of Constantinople.
|
|
9. San Apollinare Nuovo, Ravenna. Mosaic of Justinian's palace.
|
|
10. Constantine IV (668-685) grants tax immunity to the Archbishop of
Ravenna. Although Ravenna declined in the 7th century, its basic social structure remained sub-Roman
until Aistulf took over in 751. So there were a few final expressions of the mosaic tradition of the previous
century. This work was in fact modeled on S. Vitale's Justinian mosaic, and in terms of style it
looks more to Italian miniature painting than to East Mediterranean imperial influences.
|
|